Main Article Content

Abstract

Today’s International Relations perspectives mostly dominated by eurocentric point ofview. These perspectives, become the core of IR studies and not realized by scholars from many non-Western countries in the studies and keep them away from their own“realities” in their analysis. The rise of Global IR opens some new possibilities to develop an inclusive perspective where non-Western might have their own point of view based on their own context. Using Global IR as a stepping stone, this article tries to elaborate the history of Makassar in the 17th century and its place in Southeast Asia history and to connect it with the rise of ASEAN.

Keywords

Perspektif Hubungan Internasional Hubungan Internasional Global Barat Non-Barat Makassar Asia Tenggara ASEAN

Article Details

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2011). Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond the West. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 1-19.
  2. Acharya, A. (2014). Global International Relations and Regional Worlds. International Studies Quarterly.
  3. Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2007). Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7, 287-312.
  4. Amin, S. (2009). Eurosentrisme. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  5. Anderson, B. (2002). Hantu Komparasi: Nasionalisme, Asia Tenggara, dan Dunia.
  6. Yogyakarta: Qalam.
  7. Arsuka, N. A. (2000). Bumi Langit Karaeng Pattingalloang. In J. Kristanto, 1000 Tahun
  8. Nusantara. Jakarta: Kompas.
  9. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. L. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. London:
  10. Penguin Books.
  11. Bilgin, P. (2008). Thinking past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly, 29(1), 5-23.
  12. Brown, C., & Ainley, K. (2005). Understanding International Relations (3 ed.). Hampshire: Palgrave.
  13. Buzan, B., & Acharya, A. (2010). Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. Oxon: Routledge.
  14. Chong, A. (2010). Southeast Asia: Theory between modernization and tradition? In B. Buzan, & A. Acharya, Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. Oxon: Routledge.
  15. Chun, C. (2010). Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? Reflections on and from Korea. In B. Buzan, & A. Acharya, Non-Western International Relations Theory Perspectives on and beyond Asia. Oxon: Routledge.
  16. Cox, R. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Order: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126-155.
  17. | P a g e
  18. JURNAL WANUA
  19. JURUSAN HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL
  20. UNIVERSITAS HASANUDDIN Volume 3 No. 3. Desember 2017
  21. Cummings, W. (2015). Penciptaan Sejarah: Makassar di Awal Era Modern. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
  22. Easterly, W. (2006). The White Man's Burden. New York: Penguin Press.
  23. Elias, J., & Sutch, P. (2007). International Relations: The Basics. Oxon: Routledge.
  24. Fisher, C. G. (1962). Southeast Asia : The Balkans of The Orient? A Study in Continuity and Change. Geography, 47(4), 347-367.
  25. Hall, S., & Gieben, B. (1992). Formations of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  26. Hamid, A. F. (2012). Religion, Secularism, and State in Southeast Asia. In A. B. Tickner, & D. Blaney, Thinking International Relations Differently. Oxon: Routledge.
  27. Hani, C. G. (2008). Toward a Post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and Critical International Relations Theory. International Studies Review, 10, 347-367.
  28. Hobson, J. M. (2004). Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  29. Hoffman, S. (1977). An American Social Science: International Relations. Daedalus, 1, 41-60.
  30. Huntington, S. (1996). Clash of Civilization and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simor & Schuster.
  31. Jackson, R. H. (2000). The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  32. Jones, B. G. (2006). Decolonizing International Relations. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  33. Karan, P. P. (2004). The non-Western World: Development, Environment, and Human Rights. Oxon: Routledge.
  34. Leonard, A. (2004). Warisan Arung Palakka: Sejarah Sulawesi Selatan Abad ke-17. Makassar: Ininnawa.
  35. Mahbubani, K. (2008). The New Asian Hemisphere. New York: Public Affairs. Mahbubani, K., & Sng, J. (2017). Keajaiban ASEAN: Penggerak Perdamaian. Jakarta:
  36. Gramedia.
  37. Mattulada. (2011). Menyusuri Jejak Kehadiran Makassar dalam Sejarah (1510-1700). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
  38. | P a g e
  39. JURNAL WANUA
  40. JURUSAN HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL
  41. UNIVERSITAS HASANUDDIN Volume 3 No. 3. Desember 2017
  42. Mehmet, O. (1999). Westernizing the Third World (2nd Edition ed.). London & New York: Routledge.
  43. Osiander, A. (2001). Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth. International Organization, 55(2), 251-287.
  44. Puchala, D. J. (1997). Some Non-Western Perspectives on International Relations. Journal of Peace Research, 34(2), 129-134.
  45. Reid, A. (1980). The Structure of Cities in Southeast Asia, Fifteenth to Seventeenth Centuries. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 11(2), 235-250.
  46. Reid, A. (1999). Asia Tenggara dalam Kurun Niaga 1450-1680 Jilid 2: Jaringan Perdagangan Global. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  47. Reid, A. (2004). Sejarah Modern Awal Asia Tenggara. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  48. Reid, A. (2009). Pluralisme dan Kemajuan Makassar Abad ke-17. In R. Tol, K. Van Dijk, & G. Accioli, Kuasa dan Usaha di Masyarakat Sulawesi Selatan. Makassar: Ininnawa.
  49. Reid, A. (n.d.). The Seventeenth-Century Crisis in Southeast Asia. Modern Asian Studies, 24(4), 639-659.
  50. Sebastian, L. C., & Lanti, I. G. (2010). Perceiving Indonesian Approaches to International Relations Theory. In B. Buzan, & A. Acharya, Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. Oxon: Routledge.
  51. Sen, A. (2006). Identity and Violence. New York: WW Norton.
  52. Severino, R. C. (2008). ASEAN. Singapura: ISEAS.
  53. Tickner, A. B. (2003). Hearing Latin American Voices in International Relations Studies. International Studies Perspectives, 4, 325-350.
  54. Tickner, A. B. (2003). Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 32(2), 295-324.
  55. Tickner, A. B., & Blaney, D. L. (2012). Thinking International Relations Differently. Oxon: Routledge.
  56. Tickner, A. B., & Waever, O. (2009). International Relations Scholarship Around the World. Oxon: Routledge.
  57. Wolf, E. R. (2010). Europe and the People Without History. Berkeley & Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.