POLITIK TRANSAKSIONAL DALAM PILKADA SERENTAK DAN IMPLIKASINYA BAGI PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH DI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31947/politics.v2i1.1659Keywords:
Election, Transactional Politics, Political Parties, Local GovernmentAbstract
Simultaneous implementation of the election already held on 9 December 2015, essentially is an alternative system of direct local elections in order to save significant budget of budget execution during the election is charged to the budget. But in its implementation, simultaneous election in 2015 was allegedly gave birth to the various phenomena associated with transactional politics that emerged in the process of election.This paper prepared using descriptive method through a qualitative approach. The data collection is done by using study of literature through the study of literature related to the phenomenon of transactional politics in the election simultaneously in Indonesia in 2015, and its implications for government formed from the election process.Concurrent election implementation in 2015 gave rise to various phenomena associated with transactional politics that political barter, stuffed politics, politics of high costs, and the existence of money politics in voting behavior. In general, transactional politics injure the realization of democratic elections and the implications for the process of the election itself less democratic. In particular, the transactional politics that can bring the seeds of mistrust support to political parties and may confuse its supporters over the choice of a political party, led to the behavior of corrupt government officials, and local autonomy are not positively correlated to improving the welfare and quality of life of the people.Downloads
References
Agustino, Leo dan Yusoff, Muhammad Agus.2010. “Pilkada dan Pemekaran Daerah dalam Demokrasi Lokal di Indonesia: Local Long Strongmen dan Roving Bandits”. Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History, Politics dan Strategics Studies. Vol 37 (2010), hal 86-104.
Ali, Mahfud. 2003. “Money Politics dalam Pilkada”.Jurnal Hukum, Volume XII No. 2.Oktober 2003, hal 227-234.
Djauhari.2011.”Problematika Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Secara Langsung (Dalam perspektif Sosiologis)”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol. 11 Edisi Khusus Februari 2011.
Fitriyah.2012. “Fenomena Politik Uang dalam Pilkada”.Jurnal Politik Vol. 3, No. 1 April 2012.
Fitriyah. 2013. “Perilaku memilih dalam Pilkada kabupaten Kudus 2013”. Jurnal Politika Vol. 4 No. 1, April 2013.
Hidayat, Syarif (ed.). 2006. Bisnis dan Politik di Tingkat Lokal: Pengusaha, Penguasa, dan Penyelenggara Pemerintahan Pasca Pilkada. Jakarta: P2E-LIPI.
Kumorotomo, Wahyudi. 2009. ”Intervensi Parpol, Politik Uang dan Korupsi: Tantangan Kebijakan Publik Setelah Pilkada Langsung”, Makalah disajikan dalam Konferensi Administrasi Negara. Surabaya, 15 Mei 2009.
Lomulus, Johny. 2007. ”Sikap Pemilih terhadap Pasangan Calon Menjelang PILKADA Langsung di Kota Bitung”, dalam Demokrasi Mati
Suri, Jurnal Penelitian Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 Tahun 2007.
Sumber Lainnya
Asshiddiqi, Asep Zaki. (2015). Gejala Politik Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Indonesia 2015.
http://kaltim.tribunnews.com/2015/07/29/ini-ciri-calon-boneka-versi-ketua-bawaslu-kaltim
http://www.Luwuraya.net/senin 19 oktober 2015
http://www.komunitasdemokrasi.or.id/article/pilkada.pdf
Kompas, 19 April 2005.
Kompas, 6 Juli 2011