Analysis of The Aiken Index to Measure The Content Validity of The Wolio Language and Culture Preservation Model Instrument

Authors

Firman Alamsyah Mansyur Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton
Arsyad Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, Indonesia
Abdul Manaf Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v6i3.29667

Keywords:

Aiken Index, Content Validity, Instrument

Abstract

This research aims to determine the content validity of the Wolio language and culture preservation model measurement instrument. This type of research is development research, using quantitative descriptive methods. The research subjects consisted of 9 experts, namely lecturers and teachers who understand the Wolio language and culture preservation model. Experts assess each item of the instrument statement. The instrument uses an ordinal rating scale and consists of 3 indicators. The collected data was analyzed using the Aiken's V formula. As a result, of the 15 instrument statement items, the content validity coefficient was greater than 0.74, indicating that all items were valid. There are 13 items in the very good category and 2 items in the good category. So this instrument is very suitable for use in measuring or assessing models of sociolinguistic preservation of language and culture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, M.j., & Yen, W.M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, Mexico: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

Aiken, Lewis R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and psychological measurement 45(1), 131-142.

Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2011). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar

DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle‐Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., ... & Kostas‐Polston, E. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing scholarship, 39(2), 155-164.

Gronlund, N.E., Linn, R.L., & Miller, M.D. (2009). Measurement & evaluation in teaching. Tenth edition. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.

Guion, R. M. (1977). Content validity: the source of my discontent. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(1), 1 – 10.

Kamaluddin, LD & LD. Munafi. (2020). Penyusnan naskah akademik rancangan perda pelestarian bahasa, aksara dan sastra wolio. Baubau; (Belum dipublikasikan)

Manaf, A., Adri, D., Aminu, N., Nur Arini, W. O., & Abdullah, N. (2023). Pelatihan analisis karakteristik item soal tes dengan menggunakan program iteman pada guru sekolah dasar negeri 2 wameo. Jurnal Pelatihan Pendidikan, 1(2), 70-81.

Mansyur, F. A. (2016). Onina Manga Mancuana Mangenge: Kognisi Religi Orang Wolio (Linguistik Antropologis). Journal Prassasti Conference Series, 326-333. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosidingprasasti/article/view/1526

Mansyur, F.A. (2017). Onina Manga Mancuana Mangenge: Kognisi Religi Orang Wolio (Linguistik Antropologis). The 8th International Seminar on Diaspora of Austronesian and Non Austronesian Languanges and Literature in Indonesia,199-208. Denpasar, Bali: Faculty of Arts, Universitas Udayana.

Mansyur, F.A. (2018). Onina manga mancuana mangenge: traditional wolio (Doctoral dissertation), from.http://digilib.fib.ugm.ac.id/digital/filter/960.

Mansyur, F.A., R. Said. (2020). A cognitive semantics Analysis of Wolio proverbs related to the human body. 1st Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities, Economics and Social Sciences (BIS-HESS 2019), 259-262. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/bis-hess-19/125939499.

Mansyur, F. A., & Suherman, L. A. (2020). The Function of Proverbs as Educational Media: Anthropological Linguistics on Wolio Proverbs. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 3(2), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v3i2.10505

Mansyur, F. A., Arsad, Nazar, A. ., Hikmah, I. ., & Zilani. (2022). A Model of Wolio Language Maintenance Strategies in Society 5.0. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(2), 284-292. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i2.21510

Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (1991). Psychological Testing: principles and applications. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Pandawa, R. M., Ridwan, A., & Mahdiyah. (2021). Analysis of the instrument content validity using the aiken index on disaster nursing competency assessment. Degres, 20(1), 298–308. https://www.degres.pw

Rahman, F., & Weda, S. (2019). Linguistic deviation and the rhetoric figures in Shakespeare’s selected plays. XLinguage" European Scientific Language Journal", 12(1), 37-52.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Proving content validity of self-regulated learning scale (The comparison of Aiken index and expanded Gregory index). Research and Evaluation in Education, 2(2), 155-164. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i2.11029

Downloads

Published

2023-09-20

How to Cite

Mansyur, F. A., Arsyad, & Manaf, A. (2023). Analysis of The Aiken Index to Measure The Content Validity of The Wolio Language and Culture Preservation Model Instrument. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 6(3), 567-573. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v6i3.29667