Students Language Performance and TOEFL Preparation Program, Are they connected?

Authors

Ermansyah Malik 082193039557/085825566528
Yen Ai-Chun National Dong Hwa University
Chang Te-Sheng National Dong Hwa University, Taiwan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v6i2.23562

Keywords:

Correlation, Language Performance, TOEFL

Abstract

This study examines and describes the relationship between TOEFL preparation Program and Students; language performance. The study also examines the program's effect on students' TOEFL scores improvement. Using spss v.22 in analyzing the data, the researcher employed three groups of students consisting of 15 students, namely the control group, treatment 1 group, and the treatment two groups. Thus, descriptive statistics present verifiable data in numerical form, which uses statistical procedures to tabulate, describe, reflect, and summarize data properties. The two variables data examined, TOEFL paper-based testing score and FCE Cambridge speaking test score, are the focus of the research, free from context generalization of the phenomenon. The result is presented statistically using quantitative methodology. The control group was not exposed to any treatment, while 1 group was given basic general English lessons, and the treatment 2 group was trained using the specially designed TOEFL preparation course. The study result shows significant effects on the improvement of TOEFL score on the treatment 1 group's pre-test mean, the standard of deviation, and the standard error mean were 350.07, 22.745, and 5.873, respectively. The treatment 2 group's mean, the standard of deviation, and the standard error mean were 355.40, 20.117, and 5.194, respectively, and the treatment 1 group' post-test mean, the standard of deviation, and the standard error mean were 387.27, 35.204, and 9.090, respectively. The treatment 2 group's mean, standard of deviation, and standard error mean were 436.87, 44.912, and 6.925, respectively. However, the study result shows that the correlation p-value = .083 indicates no significant correlation between TOEFL Preparation students' language performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armstrong, W. B. (2000). The association among students’ success course, placement test scores, student background data and instructor grading practices. Journal of Research and Practice, 2, 681-695. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920050140837

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches (2nd Ed.) University of Nebraska, Lincoln: Sage Publications.

Gear, J. G. (1996). Cambridge Preparation for the TOEFL Test. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hamuddin, B., Rahman, F., Pammu, A., Baso, Y. S., & Derin, T. (2023). Mitigating the effects of cyberbullying crime: A multi-faceted solution across disciplines. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 6(1), 28-37.

Hasnia, H., Andini, C., Tahir, M. D., Hunaeni, H., Zulfikariandi, Z., & Muslimin, M. T. (2022). The Ability of 1st Class Students of SMAN 11 Enrekang to Arrange Verbal and Nominal Sentences. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(3), 539-550.

Junaidi, J., Budianto Hamuddin, B., Wendy, S., Fathu, R., & Tatum, D. (2020). ICT usage in teaching English in Pekanbaru: Exploring junior high school teachers’ problems. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(03), 5052-5063.

Ghosali, Imam. (2005). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS, Edisi 3, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang

Komari. (2008). Kemampuan Bahasa Inggris Mahasiswa Tingkat Akhir Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Jayapura Berdasarkan Score TOEFL. Jurnal DINAMIS, 2(2), 47-51.

Malik, E. (2019). The English Pragmatic Competence of Indonesian English Speakers. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 2(3), 477-484. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v2i3.7491

Malik, E. (2019). The Correlation of TOEFL Toward Students English Language Development. Elite Journal, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.24252/elite.v6i2a10

Nahdhiyah, N., Rahman, F., Makkah, M., & Herawaty, H. (2022, February). The Role of Learning Literary Work in Enhancing the Awareness of Loving Nature. In 67th TEFLIN International Virtual Conference & the 9th ICOELT 2021 (TEFLIN ICOELT 2021) (pp. 296-301). Atlantis Press.

Nunan, D. (1992) Reserch Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge University Press.

Rahman, F. (2018). The Constraints of Foreign Learners in Reading English Literary Works: A Case Study at Hasanuddin University. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 7(2), 01-12.

Phillips, D. (2001). Longman Preparation Course for the TOEFL test. London: Longman

Prihandoko, L. A., Anggawirya, A. M., & Rahman, F. (2021). Students’ Perceptions Towards Autonomous Learners Concept in Academic Writing Classes: Sequential Mixed-Method. In International Joined Conference on Social Science (ICSS 2021) (pp. 487-491). Atlantis Press.

Qanwal, S., & Karim, S. (2014). Identifying Correlation between Reading Strategies Instruction and L2 Text Comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching.

Santoso, Singgih. (2004). SPSS Statistik Parametrik, PT Elex Media Komputindo, Kelompok Gramedia, Jakarta.

Susanti, N. W. M. (2016) The Use of Paper-based TOEFL as a gate Keeper for Graduation: A Case Study at English Department Universitas Mataram. In: The 61st TEFLIN International Conference, 2014, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Weda, S., Atmowardoyo, H., Rahman, F., & Sakti, A. E. F. (2021). Linguistic aspects in intercultural communication (IC) practices at a higher education institution in Indonesia. Eroupean Language Scientific Journal, 14, 2-6.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-02

How to Cite

Malik, E., Ai-Chun, Y., & Te-Sheng, C. (2023). Students Language Performance and TOEFL Preparation Program, Are they connected?. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 6(2), 245-250. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v6i2.23562