This is an outdated version published on 2021-06-22. Read the most recent version.

The Effectiveness of Online Coaching through Social Networking Site

A case study of Coach Potato Indonesia

Authors

Siti Mahdaria Universitas Islam Indonesia
Titus Angga Restuaji Yayasan Santo Fransiskus Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v4i2.13888

Keywords:

Communication, Online Coaching, Online Learning

Abstract

In the more globalized world, social networking sites are used to connect people and popular as a learning platform. More people use webinars to talk about specific topics through a social network. The number of online courses raise and change the way people learn. People used to study in a classroom with a tutor in front of them, but now people only need to sit in front of a screen to learn new things. However, the effectiveness of this process is still questioned. Therefore, this study aims to analyse the effectiveness of online coaching through a social networking site and the critical challenge in online coaching and approach to tackle it. This study is qualitative research. The data is collected from online interviews with a semi-structured interview guide. The sample of the study is 12 mentees and 5 mentors who had been involved in 12 weeks of online scholarship coaching held by Coach Potato Indonesia. The data is analyzed using a thematic content method, and the effectiveness of online coaching is measured by using the Kirkpatrick Model. The result of the study is that online mentoring through social networking sites is effective and efficient, especially in particular related to geographical and financial issues. The authors found the critical challenges in online mentoring are internet connection and timing. Therefore, online mentoring should use multiple platforms to adjust with the technical issue that might occur.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Azawei, A. (2019). What drives successful social media in education and e-learning? A comparative study in Facebook and Moodle. Journal of Information Technology Education, 18, 253 – 274. https://doi.org/10.28945/4360

Alfonzo, P. (2019). Mastering mobile through social media: creating engaging content on Instagram and Snapchat. Library Technology Reports, 5(2), 1 – 42. Retrieved from https://www.journals.ala.org/index.php/ltr/issue/viewFile/715/479

Alshahrani, I. (2019). Orienting faculty and students with online teaching Webinar experiences in Saudi Arabia. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 9(1), 443 – 447. Retrieved from https://www.amhsr.org/articles/orienting-faculty-and-students-with-online-teaching-webinar-experiences-in-saudi-arabia.pdf

Bettinger, E.P., Fox, L., Loeb, S. & Taylor, E.S. (2017). Virtual classrooms: How online college courses affect student success. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2855–2875. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151193

Baranik, L. E., Wright, N. A., & Reburn, K. L. (2017). Mentoring relationships in online classes. The Internet and Higher Education, (34), 65 – 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.05.001

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.

Burke, A. S. & Fedorek, B. (2017). Does “flipping” promote engagement?: A comparison of a traditional, online, and flipped class. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417693487

Darginavičienė, I. & Navickienė, V. (2016). Social medias: opportunities for learning / teaching English in higher education. TILTAI, 1, 239 – 252. http://dx.doi.org/10.15181/tbb.v73i1.1276

Ellahi, A. (2018). Social networking sites as formal learning environments in business education. Educational & Society, 21(4), 64 – 75. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Fadlelmola, F. M., Panji, S., Ahmed, A. E., Ghouila, A., Akurugu, W. A., Entellner, J. B. D., Souiai, O. & Mulder, N. (2019). Ten simple rules for organizing a webinar series. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(4), 1 – 7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006671

Hamilton, L. A., Franks, A., Heidel, R. E., McDonough, S. L. K. & Suda, K. J. (2016). Assessing the value of online learning and social media in Pharmacy Education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(6), 1 – 7. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe80697

Hrastinski, S. & Stenbom, S. (2012). Student-student online coaching: conceptualizing an emerging learning activity. Internet and Higher Education, 16, 66 – 69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.02.003

Kinash, S., Knight D. and McLean, M. (2015). Does digital scholarship through online lectures affect student learning?. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 129–139. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.18.2.129

Kind, T. & Evans, Y. (2015). Social media for lifelong learning. International Review of Psychiatry, 27(2), 124 – 132. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2014.990421

Kirkpatrick, D. & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training programs: the four levels. San Francisco, C. A.: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Kirkpatrick Partners. (2009). The Kirkpatrick model. https://www.kirkpatrickpartners.com/Our-Philosophy/The-Kirkpatrick-Model

Maguire, M. & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: a practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (AISHE), 8(3), 3351 – 33514. Retrieved from https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335/553

Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A. & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: a review of qualitative interviews in IS research. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 11 – 22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667

Oreopoulos, P., Petronijevic, U., Logel, C. & Beattie, G. (2020). Improving non-academic student outcomes using online and text-message coaching. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 171, 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.01.009

Parusheva, S., Aleksandrova, Y. & Hadzhikolev, A. (2018). Use of social media in higher education institutions – an empirical study based on Bulgarian learning experience. TEM Journal, 7(1), 171 – 181. Retrieved from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=616234

Praslova, L. 2010. Adaptation of Kirkpatric’s four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in Higher Education. Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability, 22(3), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-010-9098-7

Prestidge, S. (2019). Categorising teachers’ use of social media for their professional learning: a self-generating professional learning paradigm. Computer and Education, 129, 143 – 158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.003

Rahman, F., & Amir, P. (2019). Trends in Reading Literary Fiction in Print and Cyber Media by Undergraduate Students of Hasanuddin University. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(2), 66-77.

Raj, M., Bhattacherjee, S. & Mukherjee, A. (2018). Usage of online social networking sites among school students of siliguri, West Bengal, India. Indian Psychiatric Society, 40(5), 452 – 458. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_70_18

Ribbers, A. & Waringa, A. (2015). E-coaching theory and practice for a new online approach to coaching. Oxon: Rouletge.

Robson, T. (2019). Fear of missing out – an essential correlate of social networking site addiction. American Journal of Medical Research, 5(1), 85 – 90. https://doi.org/10.22381/AJMR5120188

Romero, C. R. (2015). Social media as learning tool in higher education: the case of Mexico and South Korea. Sinéctica revista electrónica de educación, 44, pp. 1 – 16. https://www.sinectica.iteso.mx

Ryan, F., Coughlar, M. & Cronin, P. (2009). Interviewing in qualitative research: the one-to-one interview. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 16(6), 309 – 314. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2009.16.6.42433

Schrader, D. E. (2015). Constructivism and learning in the age of social media: changing minds and learning communities. New Direction for Teaching and Learning, (144), 23 – 35. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20160

Senvar, O. & Akkartal, E. (2018). An overview to industry 4.0. International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 10(14), 50 – 57. Retrieved from http://ijibm.site666.com/IJIBM_Vol10No4_Nov2018.pdf#page=56

Song, H., Kim, J. & Luo, W. (2015). Teacher-student relationship in online classes: a role of teacher self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 436 – 443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.037

Stein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., Stagle, P., Trinko, L. A. & Lutz, M. (2012). From ‘hello’ to higher-order thinking: the effect of coaching and feedback on online chats. Internet and Higher Education, (16), 78 – 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.03.001

Techopedia. (2019). Social networking site (SNS). Retrieved from https://www.techopedia.com/definition/4956/social-networking-site-sns

Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T. & Stijnen, S. (2014). The role of feedback and social presence in an online peer coaching program for student teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3), 326 - 341.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-22

Versions

2021-09-01 (2)
2021-06-22 (1)

How to Cite

Siti Mahdaria, & Restuaji, T. A. (2021). The Effectiveness of Online Coaching through Social Networking Site: A case study of Coach Potato Indonesia. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 4(2), 178-187. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v4i2.13888