Pemekaran sebagai arena konflik Ekonomi: Studi kasus Pada rencana pemekaran Provinsi Luwu Raya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31947/jgov.v13i1.9613Keywords:
Pemekaran, Local Elites, Elite ConflictsAbstract
Research to answer the question of why pemekaran in Luwu Raya is so complex. The study was conducted in Luwu Raya, South Sulawesi Province. Using qualitative methods with data collection techniques in the form of observation and in-depth interviews. Then analyze the data by elaborating on the results of interviews and secondary data in the form of official government reports (BPS). The results showed that the dynamics and complexity of pemekaran took place in Luwu due to the tug-of-war of the local political elite. Elite tug-of-war takes place in a very open arena, involving various local elites, including political elites and bureaucratic elites. The tug-of-war of the local elite finally makes the agenda of pemekaran that has been normatively determined to be absent from its proper schedule. Field findings also confirm that the division is not only constrained in technical terms. As much is seen from an administrative perspective, but in a political perspective there is something more than that. The author sees it as a matter of local politics. Therefore, the main argument in this study is that the tug-of-war between local political elites is the main cause of the mandate of the pemekaran process that took place in Luwu Raya.Downloads
References
Arikunto, Suharsimi, 2006, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Bottomore, T.B, 2006. Kelompok elite dalam masyarakat. Jakarta, Akbar tanjung institute.
Barbara Sillars Harvey, Pemberontakan Kahar Muzakar: Dari Tradisi ke DI/TII.Jakarta: Grafiti, 1989.
Buzan Barry, Ole Waever and Jaap de Wilde. 1998. Security: A Framework for Analysis, the United State of America. Lynne Rienner.
Dik Roth, 2007 “Gubernur banyak, provinsi tak ada: berebut provinsi di daerah Luwu- Tana Toraja di Sulawesi Selatan” dalam “Politik Lokal di Indonesia” Yayasan Obor Indonesia & KITLV-Jakarta, Jakarta.
Haryanto. 2005. Kekuasaan Elite; Suatu Bahasan Pengantar. Yogyakarta: PLOD-JIP Fisipol UGM.
Haryanto. 1991. Elit, Massa, dan Konflik Suatu Bahasan Awal. Yogyakarta. Pusat Antar Universitas (PAU)-Studi Sosial UGM.
Keller, Suzanne. 1995. Penguasa dan Kelompok Elite, Peranan Elite Penentu Dalam Masyarakat Modern. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
Koentjaningrat, 1977, Metode-Metode Penelitian Masyarakat, Jakarta: Gramedia. Marsh, David dan Stoker, Gerry. 2010. Teori dan Metode Dalam Ilmu Politik. Nusa
Media. Bandung.
Mosca, Gaetano. 1939. The Ruling Class (Element di Scienza Politica). New York and London. Mc. Graw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
Nazir, Mohammad, 2003, Metode Penelitian, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
Nurudin, Rachmad K, dan Tri Sulistyaningsih. 2006. Kebijakan Elitis Politik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.
Rauf, Maswadi. 2001. Konsensus dan Konflik Politik: Sebuah Penjajakan Teoritis. Jakarta. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Sarita Pawiloy, dkk. 1987. Sejarah Perjuan-gan Angkatan 45 di Sulawesi Selatan (17
Agustus 1945-17 Agustus 1950) (Ujungpandang: Dewan Harian Daerah (DHD) Angkatan 45 Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan.
Setiadi, Elly M. & Usman Kolip. 2013. Pengantar Sosiologi Politik. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia
Surbakti, Ramlan. Himpunan Teori-Teori Politik, Fisip Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya. Tidak dipublikasikan.
Syafrizal. 2012. Ekonomi Wilayah dan Perkotaan. Jakarta: PT Raja grafindo Persada
Syamsuddin Haris (Editor), Desentralisasi Dan Otonomi Daerah Naskah Akademik Dan RUU Usulan LIPI. LIPI Press, Jakarta. 2004. Zuhro, Siti R. 2009. Demokrasi lokal: peran aktor dalam demokrasi. Penerbit Ombak.
Yogyakarta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 GOVERNMENT : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.