Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): APRIL

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Seedling Recruitment of Native Tree Species in Active Restoration Forest

https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v4i1.9421
Yingluck Ratanapongsai
Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2062-2427

Corresponding Author(s) : Yingluck Ratanapongsai

y.ratanapongsai@gmail.com

Forest and Society, Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): APRIL

Abstract

Since the 1970’s, concern has grown over the environmental impact of deforestation over large areas in the northern mountains of Thailand and conversion of forest to agriculture. Consequently, forest restoration has become an important strategy to achieve large-scale increases in forest habitat. The framework species method (FSM) of forest restoration has been adapted and developed to restore forest ecosystems on former agricultural land in northern Thailand. The method involves planting 20-30 forest species that are characteristic of the target forest ecosystem, and it relies on incoming native tree species, to sustain forest succession. However, little is known about recruitment of native tree species and the factors that limit it, during implementation of the FSM. The study compared recruited native tree species in the seedling community of FSM trial plots with nearby tree seed sources, to assess how many, and which, species successfully recolonize FSM plot seedling communities or fail to do so. The effects of seed-dispersal agent and seed size on recruitment was compared in FSM trial plots aged 6, 10, and 14 years. Approximately half of nearby native tree species were absent from the seedling community, across all 3 restoration ages. Seed availability was the major limitation of recruitment. Large-seeded species had a lower recruitment probability than small-seeded species did (P=0.0249 (Tukey test)), whilst seed-dispersal agent had no effect (P=0.42 (Chi-square)). Recruitment rates were similar across all 3 restoration ages. Consequently, this study confirms that the framework species method is limited by availability of seed sources in the immediate vicinity of restoration sites. It is recommended that rare tree species, characteristic of the target forest ecosystem, and those with large seeds, should be added to the mix of framework tree species planted, science their natural colonization is unlikely. This would enhance species diversity and result in better restoration outcomes.

Keywords

Framework species northern Thailand seedling community limiting factors seed dispersal seed size
Ratanapongsai, Y. (2020). Seedling Recruitment of Native Tree Species in Active Restoration Forest. Forest and Society, 4(1), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v4i1.9421
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Ashton, M. S., Gunatilleke, C. V. S., Singhakumara, B. M. P., & Gunatilleke, I. A. U. N. (2001). Restoration pathways for rain forest in southwest Sri Lanka: a review of concepts and models. Forest Ecology and Management, 154(3), 409-430. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00512-6
  2. Asanok, L., Marod, D., Duengkae, P., Pranmongkol, U., Kurokawa, H., Aiba, M., ... & Nakashizuka, T. (2013). Relationships between functional traits and the ability of forest tree species to reestablish in secondary forest and enrichment plantations in the uplands of northern Thailand. Forest ecology and management, 296, 9-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.01.029
  3. Brodie, J. F. (2007). Effects of seed dispersal by gibbons, sambar, and muntjac on Choerospondias axillaris demography, and the disruption of this mutualism by wildlife poaching [Doctoral dissertation]: University of Montana.
  4. Corlett, R. T., & Hau, B. C. (2000). Seed dispersal and forest restoration. Forest restoration for wildlife conservation, 317-325.
  5. Capers, R. S., Chazdon, R. L., Brenes, A. R., & Alvarado, B. V. (2005). Successional dynamics of woody seedling communities in wet tropical secondary forests. Journal of Ecology, 93(6), 1071-1084. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01050.x
  6. Chazdon, R. L. (2014). Second growth: the promise of tropical forest regeneration in an age of deforestation. University of Chicago Press.
  7. Chen, L., Wang, L., Baiketuerhan, Y., Zhang, C., Zhao, X., & von Gadow, K. (2014). Seed dispersal and seedling recruitment of trees at different successional stages in a temperate forest in northeastern China. Journal of Plant Ecology, 7(4), 337-346. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtt024
  8. Cusack, D., & Montagnini, F. (2004). The role of native species plantations in recovery of understory woody diversity in degraded pasturelands of Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and management, 188(1-3), 1-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00302-5
  9. Dalling, J. W., Muller‐Landau, H. C., Wright, S. J., & Hubbell, S. P. (2002). Role of dispersal in the recruitment limitation of neotropical pioneer species. Journal of Ecology, 90(4), 714-727. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00706.x
  10. de Souza, F. M., & Batista, J. L. F. (2004). Restoration of seasonal semideciduous forests in Brazil: influence of age and restoration design on forest structure. Forest ecology and Management, 191(1-3), 185-200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.12.006
  11. eFloras. (2014). Flora of China, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO & Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, MA. [accessed March 2014] http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2
  12. Elliott, S., Navakitbumrung, P., Kuarak, C., Zangkum, S., Anusarnsunthorn, V., & Blakesley, D. (2003). Selecting framework tree species for restoring seasonally dry tropical forests in northern Thailand based on field performance. Forest Ecology and Management, 184(1-3), 177-191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00211-1
  13. Eshetu, E. Y. (2002). Restoration of the native woody-species diversity, using plantation species as foster trees, in the degraded highlands of Ethiopia [Doctoral dissertation]: University of Helsinki, Viikki Tropical Resources Institute (VITRI).
  14. FAO. (2010). Global forest resources assessment 2010: country report, Thailand. FAO Forestry Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/forestry/fra/67090/en/tha/
  15. Farwig, N., Sajita, N., & Böhning-Gaese, K. (2009). High seedling recruitment of indigenous tree species in forest plantations in Kakamega Forest, western Kenya. Forest ecology and management, 257(1), 143-150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.08.02
  16. FORRU. (2005). How to Plant a Forest: The Principles and. Practice of Restoring Tropical Forests. Biology Department, Science Faculty, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. Retrieved from http://www.forru.org/extra/forru/PDF_Files/htpafbook/htpafbook.pdf
  17. FORRU. 2008. Research for Restoring Tropical Forest Ecosystems: A Practical Guide. Biology Department, Science Faculty, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. Retrieved from http://www.forru.org/extra/forru/PDF_Files/rfrtfpdf/RFRTFIQ.pdf
  18. Gomes, E. P. C., Mantovani, W., & Kageyama, P. Y. (2003). Mortality and recruitment of trees in a secondary montane rain forest in southeastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 63(1), 47-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842003000100007
  19. Hammer, Ø., & Harper. D. A. (2008). Paleontological data analysis. John Wiley & Sons. USA.
  20. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia electronica, 4(1), 9.
  21. Kaewkrom, P., Gajaseni, J., Jordan, C. F., & Gajaseni, N. (2005). Floristic regeneration in five types of teak plantations in Thailand. Forest Ecology and Management, 210(1-3), 351-361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.048
  22. Koonkhunthod, N., Sakurai, K., & Tanaka, S. (2007). Composition and diversity of woody regeneration in a 37-year-old teak (Tectona grandis L.) plantation in Northern Thailand. Forest Ecology and Management, 247(1-3), 246-254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.053
  23. Maxwell, J. F., & Elliot, S. (2001). Vegetation and vascular flora of Doi Sutep-Pui national park, Northern Thailand (No. 5). Biodiversity Research and Training Program.
  24. Meers, T. L., Enright, N. J., Bell, T. L., & Kasel, S. (2012). Deforestation strongly affects soil seed banks in eucalypt forests: generalisations in functional traits and implications for restoration. Forest ecology and management, 266, 94-107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.004
  25. Oberhauser, U. (1997). Secondary forest regeneration beneath pine (Pinus kesiya) plantations in the northern Thai highlands: a chronosequence study. Forest Ecology and Management, 99(1-2), 171-183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00203-X
  26. Reid, J. L., Holl, K. D., & Zahawi, R. A. (2015). Seed dispersal limitations shift over time in tropical forest restoration. Ecological Applications, 25(4), 1072-1082. doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1399.1
  27. Sangsupan, H. A., Hibbs, D. E., Withrow-Robinson, B. A., & Elliott, S. (2018). Seed and microsite limitations of large-seeded, zoochorous trees in tropical forest restoration plantations in northern Thailand. Forest Ecology and Management, 419, 91-100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.03.021
  28. Sheil, D., & May, R. M. (1996). Mortality and recruitment rate evaluations in heterogeneous tropical forests. Journal of ecology, 91-100. doi: 10.2307/2261703 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2261703
  29. Sinhaseni, K. (2008). Natural establishment of tree seedling in forest restoration trials at Ban Mae Sa mai, Chiang Mai Province. [master’s thesis]: Chiang Mai University. Thailand.
  30. Tabarelli, M., & Peres, C. A. (2002). Abiotic and vertebrate seed dispersal in the Brazilian Atlantic forest: implications for forest regeneration. Biological Conservation, 106(2), 165-176. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00243-9
  31. Tucker, N. I., & Murphy, T. M. (1997). The effects of ecological rehabilitation on vegetation recruitment: some observations from the Wet Tropics of North Queensland. Forest ecology and management, 99(1-2), 133-152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00200-4
  32. Viani, R. A. G., Vidas, N. B., Pardi, M. M., Castro, D. C. V., Gusson, E., & Brancalion, P. H. (2015). Animal-dispersed pioneer trees enhance the early regeneration in Atlantic Forest restoration plantations. Natureza & Conservação, 13(1), 41-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2015.03.005
  33. Wydhayagarn, C., Elliott, S., & Wangpakapattanawong, P. (2009). Bird communities and seedling recruitment in restoring seasonally dry forest using the framework species method in Northern Thailand. New Forests, 38(1), 81-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-009-9133-z
Read More

Author Biography

Yingluck Ratanapongsai, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100
Ph.D.’s Degree Program in Faculty of Science,
Download this PDF file
PDF