Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): APRIL

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Protecting Forested Areas in Non-Forest Zone through The Ecological Fiscal Transfer Scheme in Indonesia: A case study from Kutai Timur district

https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v6i1.19193
Mohamad Nasir
Faculty of Law, Universitas Balikpapan, Balikpapan, Indonesia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9375-9168

Corresponding Author(s) : Mohamad Nasir

mohamad.nasir@uniba-bpn.ac.id

Forest and Society, Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): APRIL

Abstract

Ecological fiscal transfer (EFT) is an incentive scheme of budgetary transfers from different levels of a government (central and regional) to reward performances in environmental management. In Indonesia, EFT is mainly intended to protect forest zones or protected areas but does not include forested areas in the non-forest zone. This article investigates the opportunities and challenges of adopting the EFT scheme as a policy instrument to maintain the forested areas in Kutai Timur, a district in East Kalimantan province with the largest forested areas in its non-forest zone. This study applies a socio-legal approach along with a regulatory simplification instrument to examine the laws and regulations surrounding the adoption of an EFT scheme in Kutai Timur district.  It demonstrates that the Kutai Timur district government can adopt the EFT scheme, given that they have the authority to manage the APL and village funds allocation. The scheme has no specific requirements or standards, identifying priority issues in the environmental sector. To adopt the scheme, the district government should develop criteria and indicators by considering the goals and priorities of district development, the data availability, and the opportunity for every village to implement it. The preparation of these criteria and indicators must be carried out in a participatory and accountable process to be well accepted by the stakeholders. Further, the district government requires integrating the EFT scheme in district policies on village funds allocation. By implementing the EFT scheme, the district government can encourage village governments and villagers to protect and manage forested areas in their village.

Keywords

Forested areas Non-forest zone Ecological fiscal transfer Village funds allocation Kutai Timur
Nasir, M. . (2022). Protecting Forested Areas in Non-Forest Zone through The Ecological Fiscal Transfer Scheme in Indonesia: A case study from Kutai Timur district. Forest and Society, 6(1), 399-421. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v6i1.19193
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Alisjahbana, A. S., & Busch, J. M. (2017). Forestry, Forest Fires, and Climate Change in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 53(2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2017.1365404
  2. Amirta, R., Sulistioadi, Y. B., Suba, R. B., Setiawati, Huesin, N., Syoim, M., & Kiswanto. (2019a). Gambaran Umum Wilayah Studi dan Rincian Rencana Kerja di Kabupaten Kutai Timur Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. Fakultas Kehutanan Universitas Mulawarman
  3. Amirta, R., Sulistioadi, Y. B., Suba, R. B., Setiawati, Husien, N., Kiswanto, & Syoim, M. (2019b). Pemetaan Baseline Areal Bernilai Konservasi Tinggi di Kabupaten Kutai Timur Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. Fakultas Kehutanan Universitas Mulawarman
  4. Anau, N., Hakim, A., Lekson, A. S., & Setyowati, E. (2019). Local Wisdom Practices of Dayak Indigenous People in the Management of Tana' Ulen in the Kayan Mentarang National Park of Malinau Regency, North Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 91(7), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2019-07.16
  5. Austin, K. G., Schwantes, A., Gu, Y., & Kasibhatla, P. S. (2019). What causes deforestation in Indonesia? Environmental Research Letters, 14(2), 024007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf6db
  6. Badan Kebijakan Fiskal. (2019). Pendanaan Publik Untuk Pengendalian Perubahan Iklim Indonesia Tahun 2016 - 2018. Badan Kebijakan Fiskal (BKF) Kementerian Keuangan
  7. Bakker, L. (2005). Resource claims between tradition and modernity: Masyarakat Adat strategies in Mului (Kalimantan Timur). Borneo Research Bulletin, 36, 29–50. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/36892/36892.pdf
  8. Bakker, L. (2009). Who owns the Land? Looking for Law and Power in East Kalimantan. Radboud University
  9. Banakar, R. (2019). On Socio-Legal Design. Lund University.
  10. Barthel, M., Jennings, S., Schreiber, W., Sheane, R., Royston, S., Llp, K., Fry, J., Leng Khor, Y., & McGill, J. (2018). Study on the environmental impact of palm oil consumption and on existing sustainability standards. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/forests/pdf/palm_oil_study_kh0218208enn_new.pdf
  11. BIOFIN. (2018). Innovative Financing for Diversity Through Ecological Transfer (EFT). Retrieved from http://www.biodiversityfinance.org/sites/default/files/content/ knowledge_products/EFT Infographic_0.pdf
  12. BIOFIN. (2021). Ecological fiscal transfers : a win-win solution for people & planet. Retrieved from https://www.biofin.org/news-and-media/ecological-fiscal-transfers
  13. Boadway, R., & Shah, A. (2009). Fiscal Federalisme: principles and practices in multiorder governance. Cambridge University Press.
  14. BPS Kalimantan Timur. (2021). Provinsi Kalimantan Timur Dalam Angka 2021. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Provinsi Kalimantan Timur
  15. BPS Kutai Timur. (2021). Kabupaten Kutai Timur Dalam Angka 2021. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Kabupaten Kutai Timur
  16. Brack, D. (2019). Forests and Climate Change. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/esa/forests/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/UNFF14-BkgdStudy-SDG13-March2019.pdf
  17. Busch, J., Ring, I., Akullo, M., Amarjargal, O., Borie, M., Cassola, R. S., ... & Zhou, K. (2021). A global review of ecological fiscal transfers. Nature Sustainability, 4(9), 756-765. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00728-0
  18. Christmas, S. K., Hardiyanti, M., & Prawira, S. A. (2021). Role in the Forest Village Community-Based Forest Management Sustainable Development. Journal of Judicial Review, 23(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v23i1.4387
  19. de Paulo, F. L. L., & Camões, P. J. S. (2019). Ecological Fiscal Transfers for Biodiversity Conservation Policy: A Transaction Costs Analysis of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Ecological Economics, 166, 106425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106425
  20. de Paulo, F. L. L., & Camões, P. J. S. (2021). An analysis of delay in implementing ecological fiscal transfers in Brazil. Environmental Development, 37, 100550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100550
  21. Di Gregorio, M., Nurrochmat, D. R., Paavola, J., Sari, I. M., Fatorelli, L., Pramova, E., ... & Kusumadewi, S. D. (2017). Climate policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages. Environmental Science & Policy, 67, 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.004
  22. Diskominfo Perstik Kutim. (2021). Kutai Timur Menjadi yang Terbesar di Kaltim, Industri Hilir Kelapa Sawit Akan di Canangkan. Retrieved from https://www.kutaitimurkab.go.id/page/articles/321
  23. Ditjen PKTL. (2019). Rekalkulasi Penutupan Lahan Indonesia Tahun 2018. Direktorat Inventarisasi dan Pemantauan Sumber Daya Hutan.
  24. Droste, N. (2017). Incentive Effects in Ecological Fiscal Transfers Evidence based foundations for policy advice [Doctoral dissertation]. Martin-Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg. http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/6655
  25. Eckstein, D., Künzel, V., Schäfer, L., & Winges, M. (2019). Global Climate Risk Index 2020. Retrieved from https://www.germanwatch.org/sites/germanwatch.org/ files/20-2-01eGlobal Climate Risk Index 2020_14.pdf
  26. Edwards, D. P., Fisher, B., & Wilcove, D. S. (2012). High Conservation Value or high confusion value? Sustainable agriculture and biodiversity conservation in the tropics. Conservation Letters, 5(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00209.x
  27. Edwin, M., Sulistyorini, I. S., & Allo, J. K. (2017). Assessment of Natural Resources and Local Community Participationin Nature-Based Tourism of Wehea Forest, East Kalimantan. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika (Journal of Tropical Forest Management), 23(3), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.23.3.128
  28. Erbaugh, J. T., & Nurrochmat, D. R. (2019). Paradigm shift and business as usual through policy layering: Forest-related policy change in Indonesia (1999-2016). Land Use Policy, 86, 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.021
  29. Fisher, M. R., Dhiaulhaq, A., & Sahide, M. A. K. (2019). The politics, economies, and ecologies of Indonesia's third generation of social forestry: An introduction to the special section. Forest and Society, 3(1), 152. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6348
  30. GGGI. (2016). Mainstreaming Green Growth In Investment Planning: A Handbook to Use extended Cost Benefit Analysis. The Global Green Growth Institute.
  31. Gusti, M. N. (2019). Kaltara Satu-satunya yang Terapkan Sistem Anggaran Berbasis Ekologi. Accessed from https://kaltara.antaranews.com/berita/456928/kaltara-satu-satunya-yang-terapkan-sistem-anggaran-berbasis-ekologi
  32. Halimatussadiah, A., Saputra, W., Haryanto, J. T. (2021). Meningkatkan Kualitas Lingkungan Hidup dengan Transfer Fiskal Berbasis Ekologi di Indonesia. Retrieved from https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00XFQG.pdf
  33. Haryanto, T. J. (2016). Ecological Fiscal Transfer dan Kebakaran Hutan. Retrieved from https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/media/4378/ecological-fiscal-transfer-dan-kebakaran-hutan.pdf
  34. Hecht, J. E. (2016). Indonesia: Costs of climate change in 2050. Retrieved from https://www.climatelinks.org/sites/default/files/asset/document/Indonesia Costs of CC 2050 Policy Brief.pdf
  35. Herlambang, H., Suhardiman, A., Syafrudin, M., & Fahmi, A. N. (2020). Kajian Kebijakan Pengelolaan Areal Berhutan di Luar Kawasan Hutan, di Kabupaten Kutai Timur, Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. Fakultas Kehutanan Universitas Mulawarman
  36. Herman, A. Y., Febriyanti, A. S., Sugandi, E., Endrawati, Adhki, I. I., ..., & Parisy, Y. (2019). Kondisi Tutupan Hutan di Luar Kawasan Hutan Kalimantan Tahun 2018. Direktorat Jenderal Planologi Kehutanan Dan Tata Lingkungan Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan.
  37. Hoesein, Z. A. (2012). Pembentukan Hukum dalam Perspektif Pembaruan Hukum. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 1(3), 307-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v1i3.87
  38. Hutchinson, T. (2016). The Doctrinal Method: Incorporating Interdisciplinary Methods in Reforming the Law. Erasmus Law Review, 38(3), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.5553/elr.000055
  39. Ifrani, Abby, Barkatullah, Nurhayati, & Said. (2019). Forest Management Based on Local Culture of Dayak Kotabaru in the Perspective of Customary Law for a Sustainable Future and Prosperity of the Local Community. Resources, 8(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020078
  40. IUCN. (2021). Forests and Climate Change Issues Brief. Retrieved from https://www.iucn.org/resources/issues-briefs/marine-plastics
  41. Jennings, S., Nussbaum, R., Evans, T., ProForest, & Forestry, W. W. F. and I. C. on F. P. A. partnership to promote responsible. (2003). The High Conservation Value Forest Toolkit (1st ed.). ProForest.
  42. KalFor. (2018). Kebijakan Insentif yang Inovatif dalam Penyelamatan Hutan di APL (Nr. 3; Penyelamatan Hutan Tersisa Di APL Untuk Kemakmuran Bersama). Accessed from https://kalimantanforest.org/media/2019/05/Policy-Brief-Seri-3_Kebijakan-Insentif-dalam-penyelamatan-hutan-di-APL-compressed.pdf
  43. Karki, S. (2002). Community involvement in and management of forest fires in South East Asia. Project FireFight South East Asia.
  44. Kettunen, M., Illes, A., Tucker, G., Baldock, D., Rayment, M., Ebrahim, N., ... & Santos, R. (2017). Integration approach to financing of biodiversity: evaluation of results and analysis of options for the future. Institute for European Policy (IEEP). Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/bfc0e7f6-0a19-11e7-8a35-01aa75ed71a1
  45. Kharel, A. (2018). Doctrinal Legal Research. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3130525
  46. Loft, L., Gebara, M. F., & Wong, G. Y. (2016). The experience of ecological fiscal transfers: Lessons for REDD+ benefit sharing. Occasional Paper 154. CIFOR. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006168
  47. Leo, S., Supriatna, J., Mizuno, K., & Margules, C. (2022). Indigenous Dayak Iban customary perspective on sustainable forest management, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 23(1), 424–435. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230144
  48. Lintas Papua. (2019). Kabupaten Jayapura Pertama di Papua Terapkan Transfer Keuangan Berbasis Lingkungan EFT. Accessed from http://lintaspapua.com/2019/11/24/di-papua-baru-kabupaten-jayapura-menerapkan-skema-transfer-keuangan-berbasis-eft/
  49. Maggio, G. F. (1996). Inter/intra-generational Equity: Current Applications under International Law for Promoting the Sustainable Development of Natural Resources. Buffalo Environmental Law Journal, 4(2).
  50. Maulana, S. (2019). Siapa Penguasa Tanah Kaltim? Accessed from https://kaltimkece.id/warta/lingkungan/siapa-penguasa-tanah-kaltim
  51. Mumbunan, S. (2011). Ecological Fiscal Transfers In Indonesia [Doctoral dissertation]. Leipzig University. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-qucosa-69240
  52. Mumbunan, S., Ring, I., & Lenk, T. (2012). Ecological fiscal transfers at the provincial level in Indonesia. UFZ Discussion Papers, 6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239811364_Ecological_fiscal_transfers_at_the_provincial_level_in_Indonesia
  53. Nanang, M., & Devung, S. (2004). Indonesia Country Report 2004: Local People in Forest Management and The Politics of Participation. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
  54. Niti Suari Giri, N. P. (2016). Lembaga Negara Pembentuk Undang-undang. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 2(1), 2071–2079. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v2i1.7283
  55. Nurfatriani, F., Darusman, D., Nurrochmat, D. R., Yustika, A. E., & Muttaqin, M. Z. (2015). Redesigning Indonesian forest fiscal policy to support forest conservation. Forest Policy and Economics, 61, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.07.006
  56. Nurrochmat, D. R., Boer, R., Ardiansyah, M., Immanuel, G., & Purwawangsa, H. (2020). Policy forum: Reconciling palm oil targets and reduced deforestation: Landswap and agrarian reform in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 119, 102291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102291
  57. Otto, J. M., Stoter, W. S. R., & J. Arnscheidt. (2008). Using legislative theory to improve law and development projects. In B. van Rooij, J. Arnscheidt, & J.M. Otto (Eds.), Lawmaking for development: An introduction (pp. 53–74). Leiden University Press.
  58. Oxtora, R. (2020, December 3). Pemkab Kubu Raya terapkan skema TAKE untuk ADD. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/1874660/pemkab-kubu-raya-terapkan-skema-take-untuk-add#:~:text=Pontianak (ANTARA) - Pemerintah Kubu,hidup dan kehutanan (ekologis).
  59. Paulo, F. L. L. de, Medeiros, R. D. M. de, & Camões, P. J. S. (2020). The Role of the Ecological Fiscal Transfers for Water Conservation Policies. In W. L. Filho, U. Tortato, & F. Frankenberger (Eds.), Universities and Sustainable Communities: Meeting the Goals of the Agenda 2030 (Issue World Sustainability Series., pp. 61–69). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30306-8
  60. Pemkab Kutai Timur. (2020). Laporan Keterangan Pertanggungjawaban Bupati Kutai Timur Tahun 2020. Bappeda Kabupaten Kutai Timur
  61. Pemkab Kutai Timur. (2021). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah ( RPJMD ) Kabupaten Kutai Timur Tahun 2021-2026. Bappeda Kabupaten Kutai Timur
  62. Putra, R. A. S., Muluk, S., Salam, R., Untung, B., & Rahman, E. (2019). Mengenalkan Skema Insentif Fiskal Berbasis Ekologi di Indonesia: TAKE, TAPE, dan TANE. The Asia Foundation (TAF)
  63. Rahmani, T. A., Nurrochmat, D. R., Hero, Y., Park, M. S., Boer, R., & Satria, A. (2021). Evaluating the feasibility of oil palm agroforestry in Harapan Rainforest, Jambi, Indonesia. Forest and Society, 5(2), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i2.10375
  64. Ring, I. (2004). Integrating local ecological services into intergovernmental fiscal transfers: the case of the ICMS-E in Brazil. In UFZ - Discussion Papers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222345716_Integrating_local_ecological_services_into_intergovernmental_fiscal_transfers_The_case_of_the_ecological_ICMS_in_Brazil
  65. Ring, I., & Barton, D. N. (2015). Economic instruments in policy mixes for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem governance. In Joan Martinez-Alier & R. Muradian (Eds.), Handbook of Ecological Economics (Issue September, pp. 413–449). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471416.00021
  66. Rodrigues, L. C. (2014). Ecological Fiscal Transfer ( EFT ) in Portugal. https://ieep.eu/uploads/articles/attachments/2fa8b43b-13cc-4878-a670-ced2e31b4caf/PT Ecological Fiscal Transfer final.pdf?v=63680923242
  67. Rossita, A., Nurrochmat, D. R., Boer, R., Hein, L., & Riqqi, A. (2021). Assessing The Monetary Value Of Ecosystem Services Provided By Gaung – Batang Tuaka Peat Hydrological Unit (Khg), Riau Province. Heliyon, 7(10), e08208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08208
  68. Sadiawati, D., Lilly Widayati, N, M. S., & Malaysianto, P. (2015). Strategi Nasional Reformasi Regulasi. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas
  69. Safitri, M. A. (2010). Forest tenure in Indonesia: the socio-legal challenges of securing communitiesrights. Leiden University.
  70. Sartini. (2010). Menggali Kearifan Lokal Nusantara. Jurnal Filsafat, 37(2), 111–120. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/wisdom/article/view/33910/20262
  71. Schrama, W. (2011). How to carry out interdisciplinary legal research Some experiences with an interdisciplinary research method. Utrecht Law Review, 7(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.152
  72. Seidman, A., Seidman, R. B., & Abeyesekere, N. (2001). Legislative Drafting for Democratic Social Change. Kluwer Law International.
  73. Senior, M. J. M., Brown, E., Villalpando, P., & Hill, J. K. (2015). Increasing the Scientific Evidence Base in the "High Conservation Value" (HCV) Approach for Biodiversity Conservation in Managed Tropical Landscapes. Conservation Letters, 8(5), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12148
  74. Sheriffdeen, M., Nurrochmat, D. R., Perdinan, P., & Di Gregorio, M. (2020). Indicators to Evaluate the Institutional Effectiveness of National Climate Financing Mechanisms. Forest and Society, 4(2), 358–378. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v4i2.10309
  75. Siombo, M. R. (2021). Local wisdom as basic material for drafting local government regulations. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 1067–1075. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1690
  76. Siscawati, M., Banjade, M. R., Liswanti, N., Herawati, T., Mwangi, E., Wulandari, C., Tjoa, M., & Silaya, T. (2017). Overview of forest tenure reforms in Indonesia. In Working Paper (Nr. 223). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006402
  77. Stephane Hallegatte, Bangalore, M., Bonzanigo, L., Fay, M., Kane, T., Narloch, U., Rozenberg, J., Treguer, D., & Vogt-Schilb, A. (2016). Shock Waves: managing the Impacts of Climate Change on Poverty. Climate Change and Development Series. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0673-5
  78. Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434
  79. Stewart, C, George, P., Rayden, T., & Nussbaum, R. (2008). Good practice guidelines for High Conservation Value assessments (1st ed.). ProForest. assets.panda.org/downloads/hcv_good_practice_final.pdf
  80. Stewart, Christopher, Lindhe, A., & Cura, A. (2010). REDD + co-benefits and the High Concervation Value (HCV) concept (Christopher Stewart, A. Lindhe, & A. Cura (eds.)). ProForest. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235704719_REDD_co-benefits_and_the_HCV_concept/link/57652af808aedbc345f346d5/download
  81. Streck, C. (2009). Protecting Forests To Mitigate Global Climate Change. In K.-L. Koh, L. H. Lye, & J. Lin (Eds.), Crucial Issues in Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol (pp. 559–576). World Scientific C. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814277532_0016
  82. Suhardiman, A., Hidayat, A., Applegate, G. B., & Colfer, C. J. P. (2002). Manual praktek mengelola hutan dan lahan: suatu kombinasi pengetahuan tradisional masyarakat Dayak Kenyah dengan ilmu-ilmu kehutanan dan pertanian. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/001104
  83. Tahir, M., Sobri, M., Novitasari, S., Nursaptini, N., & Anar, A. P. (2021). Learning Local Content of Cultural Arts Based on Local Genius of Sasak Culture in PGSD Students. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference on Education and Social Science (ACCESS 2020), 556(Access 2020), 528–530. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210525.142
  84. Teras Kaltim. (2021, December 13). Diduga Lakukan Korupsi DD dan ADD , Dua Oknum Pejabat Desa Di Kutim Tengah di Incar Polisi. https://teraskaltim.id/2021/12/13/diduga-lakukan-korupsi-dd-dan-add-dua-kades-di-kutim-tengah-di-incar-polisi/
  85. Triatmodjo, M. (2005). Implikasi Berlakunya Protokol Kyoto 1997 terhadap Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol2.2.5
  86. UNDP. (2018). The BIOFIN Workbook 2018: Finance for Nature. The Biodiversity Finance Initiative. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
  87. Wahyu, A., Suharjito, D., Darusman, D., & Syaufina, L. (2020). The Development of Community-Based Forest Management in Indonesia and Its Contribution to Community Welfare and Forest Condition. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 528(1), 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/528/1/012037
  88. Weiss, E. B. (2008). Climate Change, Intergenerational Equity, and International Law. Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, 9(3), 615. https://doi.org/10.2307/vermjenvilaw.9.3.615
  89. World Economic Forum. (2020). The Global Risks Report 2020. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risk_Report_2020.pdf
  90. WWF Indonesia. (2019). Studi Indikator Ekologis Untuk Skema Transfer Fiskal Daerah. WWF Indonesia.
  91. Yovi, E. Y., & Nurrochmat, D. R. (2018). An occupational ergonomics in the Indonesian state mandatory sustainable forest management instrument: A review. Forest Policy and Economics, 91, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.11.007
  92. Zunnuraeni, & Zuhairi, A. (2018). Kewenangan Desa Dalam Pengelolaan Hutan Untuk Mitigasi Perubahan Iklim. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 6(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v6i1.524
Read More

Author Biography

Mohamad Nasir, Faculty of Law, Universitas Balikpapan, Balikpapan, Indonesia
Mohamad Nasir graduated with a Bachelor of Law from the Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta (1997). He then studied environmental law in the Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, and was awarded Master of Law in 2001. He is currently pursuing a doctoral study at the Department of Anthropology and Development Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, with a research focus on the contestation of natural resource management in the province of East Kalimantan, Indonesia. He started his career as a lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Balikpapan, East Kalimantan, in September 2001 and has been teaching several subjects related to environmental and natural resources law. He also conducted research and was involved in advocacy efforts with several local, national, and international NGOs in East Kalimantan, mainly on environmental, natural resource management, good governance, and law-making issues. He also published several papers in journals and conferences, both national and international.
Download this PDF file
PDF