Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): NOVEMBER

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Tree Speech: An Analysis of Discourses on Permanent Reserved Forests in Malaysian Debates since 1959

https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i2.13341
Alia Azmi
Centre of Environmental Health and Safety, Faculty of Health Science, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor, MY
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2473-7651
Rhosanna Jenkins
Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7970-5262

Corresponding Author(s) : Alia Azmi

aliaazmi@uitm.edu.my

Forest and Society, Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): NOVEMBER

Abstract

As a country that once relied heavily on the forestry industry, Malaysia is slowly trying to change their economic dependence to a more sustainable resource, however, the continued reliance on forest resources is creating a conflict between protection as well as development of the forest reserves.  To better understand the conflict that exists within the debates among the political elites in Malaysia, this paper examines the speeches on permanent reserved forests by decision makers in the Malaysian Parliamentary debates. These parliamentary debates (n = 229) were analysed using content analysis where three major themes in PRFs were identified: (1) industry and economic development; (2) environmental protection, conservation and impact; and (3) social development and community rights. Results show that economic concerns related to agriculture, timber and development dominated the parliamentary debates throughout the early discussions and the topic of PRF has been framed as primarily an economic issue by the political elites throughout the period of analysis. While there have been environmental issues discussed frequently in the debates, little change has occurred in the discussions on PRFs, which means the fundamental policy underpinning the management of these forests has not changed since colonial times. Peaks in the discussion of permanent reserved forests are associated with key legislations and events within Malaysia. This analysis indicates that the governance of PRF is largely unchanged, and while the new government indicated change could occur, the fact that they fell within two years of election does not lend to a positive note. The analysis has implications for future governance of forestry in Malaysia, which is decidedly embedded within the principle of resource use, inherited from the British era. If forests are to be protected, the fundamental principle of resource use has to be reconstructed entirely.

Keywords

forest permanent reserved forest parliamentary debates policy conservation economic resource
Azmi, A., & Jenkins, R. (2021). Tree Speech: An Analysis of Discourses on Permanent Reserved Forests in Malaysian Debates since 1959. Forest and Society, 5(2), 326-340. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i2.13341
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Azizan, M. U., Bing, T. S., Raid, M. M., Mohammad, M. T. S., Hussin, K., Abd Rahman, M. M. G. M., & Nadzri, M. I. (2017). Conflicting Role of Land Office and Forestry Department: A Comparative Discussion Regarding to Forest Offences Prevention in Malaysia. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan Undip, 15(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.15.1.11-19
  2. Azmi, A. (2019). Analysis Of (Un)Invited Participation Using Environmental Justice In Permanent Reserved Forest In Peninsular Malaysia. University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
  3. Brandt, J. S., & Buckley, R. C. (2018). A global systematic review of empirical evidence of ecotourism impacts on forests in biodiversity hotspots. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 32, 112-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.04.004
  4. Camara, M., Jamil, N. R., & Abdullah, A. F. B. (2019). Impact of land uses on water quality in Malaysia: a review. Ecological Processes, 8(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-019-0164-x
  5. Gatti, R. C., Liang, J., Velichevskaya, A., & Zhou, M. (2019). Sustainable palm oil may not be so sustainable. Science of the Total Environment, 652, 48-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.222
  6. Hardy, C., Harley, B., & Phillips, N. (2004). Discourse analysis and content analysis: Two solitudes. Qualitative methods, 2(1), 19-22.
  7. Hezri, A. (2016). The Sustainability Shift: Refashioning Malaysia's Future: Areca Books.
  8. Imai, N., Samejima, H., Langner, A., Ong, R. C., Kita, S., Titin, J., ... & Kitayama, K. (2009). Co-benefits of sustainable forest management in biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration. PLoS One, 4(12), e8267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008267
  9. Jusoff, K., & Taha, D. H. D. H. (2008). Sustainable forest management practices and environmental protection in Malaysia. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 4(3), 191-199.
  10. Kathirithamby-Wells, J. (2005). Nature and Nation: Forests and Development in Peninsular Malaysia. University of Hawaiʻi Press.
  11. Kanniah, K. D., Tan, K. P., Cracknell, A. P., Huete, A. R., Idris, N. H., Lau, A. M. S., ... & Ahmad, A. (2018). Assessment of biophysical properties of Royal Belum tropical forest, Malaysia. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 39(1), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12215
  12. Langner, A., Samejima, H., Ong, R. C., Titin, J., & Kitayama, K. (2012). Integration of carbon conservation into sustainable forest management using high resolution satellite imagery: A case study in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 18, 305-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.02.006
  13. Lee, W. C., & Baharuddin, A. H. (2018). Impacts of climate change on agriculture in Malaysia. In The Impact of Climate Change on Our Life (pp. 179-195). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7748-7_10
  14. Miyamoto, M., Parid, M. M., Aini, Z. N., & Michinaka, T. (2014). Proximate and underlying causes of forest cover change in Peninsular Malaysia. Forest Policy and Economics, 44, 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.05.007
  15. Myers, N. (1988). Threatened Biotas: hot spots in tropical forests, the Environmentalist, 8, 187–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02240252
  16. Nadzri, M. M. (2018). The 14th General Election, the fall of Barisan Nasional, and political development in Malaysia, 1957-2018. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3), 139-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341803700307
  17. Nagulendran, K., Padfield, R., Aziz, S.A., Amir, A.A., Rahman, A.R.A., Latiff, M.A., Zafir, A., Quilter, A.G., Tan, A., Arifah, S. and Awang, N. (2016). A multi-stakeholder strategy to identify conservation priorities in Peninsular Malaysia. Cogent Environmental Science, 2(1), p.1254078. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2016.1254078
  18. NFA (1984). National Forestry Act 1984, Malaysia, The Commissioner Of Law Revision.
  19. Natural Resources and Environment. (2016). Malaysia: National policy on biological diversity (2016–2025). Putrajaya: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Malaysia (NRE).
  20. Natural Resources and Environment (2017). Forestry Facts. Retrieved from http://www.nre.gov.my/en-my/Forestry/Pages/Forestry-fact.aspx
  21. O’Neill, E., Devitt, C., Lennon, M., Duvall, P., Astori, L., Ford, R. and Hughes, C., (2018). The dynamics of justification in policy reform: insights from water policy debates in Ireland. Environmental Communication, 12(4), 451-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1429478
  22. Osman, S. (2000). Globalization and democratization: the response of the indigenous peoples of Sarawak. Third World Quarterly, 21(6), 977-988. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590020011981
  23. Parameswaran, P. (May, 2020) What Does Malaysia’s Troubled Transition Mean for Democracy in South East Asia?. The Diplomat. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2020/05/what-does-malaysias-troubled-transition-mean-for-democracy-in-southeast-asia/
  24. Parlimen Malaysia (2020) Senarai Penyata Rasmi (Hansard). Retrieved from https://www.parlimen.gov.my/hansard-dewan-rakyat.html?uweb=dr&arkib=yes
  25. Ratnasingam, J., Ioras, F., Neelakandan, G., Mariapan, M., & Swan, T. T. (2011). Malaysian Forestry: Past, Present and the Future (pp. 138). Retrieved from http://www.forr.upm.edu.my/dokumen/90401_Forestry.pdf
  26. Riggs, R. A., Langston, J. D., Beauchamp, E., Travers, H., Ken, S., & Margules, C. (2020). Examining trajectories of change for prosperous forest landscapes in Cambodia. Environmental management, 66(1), 72-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01290-9
  27. Sahabat Alam Malaysia (1992). Environmental displacement in Malaysia: The Effects of the development process on rural and native communities. Refuge: Canada's Journal on Refugees, 15-19.
  28. Sarrica, M., Brondi, S., Piccolo, C., & Mazzara, B. M. (2016). Environmental consciousness and sustainable energy policies: Italian parliamentary debates in the years 2009–2012. Society & Natural Resources, 29(8), 932-947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1095379
  29. Swettenham, F. A. (1906). British Malaya: An Account of the Origin and Progress of British Influence in Malaya. J. Lane.
  30. Varkkey, H. (February, 2019) Winds of Change in Malaysia: The Government and the Climate. Heinrich Boll Stiftung, Southeast Asia. Retrieved from https://th.boell.org/en/2019/02/27/winds-change-malaysia-government-and-climate
  31. Yaakob, A. (2014). A legal analysis on law and policy on conservation of forest in Peninsular Malaysia/Adzidah Binti Yaakob. Doctoral dissertation, University Malaya.
  32. Zeng, Z., Estes, L., Ziegler, A.D., Chen, A., Searchinger, T., Hua, F., Guan, K., Jintrawet, A. and Wood, E.F. (2018). Highland cropland expansion and forest loss in Southeast Asia in the twenty-first century. Nature Geoscience, 11(8). 556-562.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF