Kinship of bidayuh dayak ethnic at the border of Entikong-Indonesia and Tebedu-Malaysia

Authors

  • Efriani Efriani Tanjungpura University
  • Hasanah Hasanah Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Tanjungpura University,
  • Galuh Bayuardi Tanjungpura University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31947/etnosia.v5i1.8300

Keywords:

Dayak, National Border, Entikong, Ethnicity, Indonesia-Malaysia, Transnational Kinship.

Abstract

This study of Dayak Bidayuh ethnic kinship system at the boundaries of Entikong and Tebedu is based on the issue of border area development, the issue of cultural extinction and cultural values, as well as the issue of cultural claims and cultural values. Besides, the existence of Bidayuh ethnic groups spread across Indonesia and Malaysia has become interesting to study and describe. The study used qualitative method by interviewing and observing people of Dayak Bidayuh in Sontas-Indonesia and Bidayauh in Entubuh-Malaysia. Based on the concept of kinship and border studies, this study shows that (1) Bidayuh Sontas Kinship System refers to the concept of kinship system with a unilateral lineage pattern, so that the Bidayuh Sontas nuclear family is part of an extended family; (2) Bidayuh Sontas has a transnational kinship pattern with Entubuh-Malaysia Bidayuh; (3) The presence of the State is the cause of the separation of Bidayuh Sontas citizenship from Bidayuh Entubuh; (4) When there is a marriage between them, the citizenship must be determined; and (5) Transnational kinship Bidayuh at the Entikong-Indonesia and Tebedu-Malaysia Border as a socio-cultural space phenomenon. An ethnic community that existed before the presence of state’s border is still continuing their daily lives, even though they have been constructed into different nationalities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Efriani Efriani, Tanjungpura University

Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Tanjungpura University,

Hasanah Hasanah, Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Tanjungpura University,

Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Tanjungpura University,

Galuh Bayuardi, Tanjungpura University

Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Tanjungpura University,

References

Amster, M. H., & Lindquist, J. (2005). Frontiers, sovereignty, and marital tactics: Comparisons from the borneo highlands and the Indonesia-Malaysia-Singapore growth triangle. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 6(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442210500074846

Arikunto, S. (1992). Prosedur Penelitian; Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bakshi, D., & Dasgupta, I. (2019). Identity Conflict with Cross-Border Spillovers. Defence and Peace Economics, 00(00), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2019.1614279

Balogh, P., & Pete, M. (2018). Bridging the Gap: Cross-border Integration in the Slovak–Hungarian Borderland around Štúrovo–Esztergom. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 33(4), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2017.1294495

Bangun, B. H. (2017). Konsepsi dan Pengelolaan Wilayah Perbatasan Negara: PerspeKtif Hukum Internasional. Tanjungpura Law Journal, 1(1), 52–63.

Braunerhielm, L., Alfredsson Olsson, E., & Medeiros, E. (2019). The importance of Swedish–Norwegian border residents’ perspectives for bottom-up cross-border planning strategies. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 73(2), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2019.1598485

Cahyo Pamungkas. (2017). Pengelolaan Perbatasan dan Hubungan Antaretnis di Bengkayang. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 6(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18196/hi.62110

Carruthers, A. (2013). National Multiculturalism, Transnational Identities. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 34(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2013.781984

Chapman, G. E., & Beagan, B. L. (2013). Food practices and transnational identities: Case studies of two Punjabi-Canadian families. Food, Culture and Society, 16(3), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.2752/175174413X13673466711688

Covarrubias, D., & Covarrubias, D. (2017). Analyzing how a Social Base Impacts Economic Development and Competitiveness Strategies in a Cross-border Context : the Case of Region Laredo Analyzing how a Social Base Impacts Economic Development and Competitiveness Strategies in a Cross-border Context. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 0(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2016.1270168

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Third Edit). London: SAGE Publications, Inc.

de Munck, V. C., & Dapkunaite, R. (2018). The modern Lithuanian kinship system: a descriptive analysis of generational differences in reckoning the saliency of kin terms. Journal of Baltic Studies, 49(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2017.1313286

Djoko Marihandono. (2010). Wilayah Perbatasan Kalimantan Barat : Sumber sejarah dan Permasalahannya. Paradigma, Jurnal Kajian Budaya, 132–151.

Efriani, Dewantara, J. A., Praptantya, D. B., Darmawan, D. R., & Hijjang, P. (2020). Maskawin sebagai Pertahanan Strata Sosial Samagat Etnik Dayak Tamambaloh. ETNOREFLIKA: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.33772/etnoreflika.v9i1.719

Faist, T. (2000). Transnationalization in international migration: Implications for the study of citizenship and culture. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23(2), 189–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/014198700329024

González-gómez, T., & Gualda, E. (2013). Cross-Border Networks in Informal and Formal Cooperation in the Border Regions Andalusia – Algarve – Alentejo and. European Planning Studies, (January 2015), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.789487

González-gómez, T., & Gualda, E. (2018). Disclosing the Relational Structure of Institutional Cross-border Cooperation in Two Cross-border Regions in Europe Disclosing the Relational Structure of Institutional Cross-. 5655(January). https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2017.1399810

Haba, J. (2012). Etnisitas, Hubungan Sosial dan Konflik di Kalimantan Barat. Masyarakat & Budaya, 14(1), 31–52.

Haviland, W. (1993). Antropologi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Hermansyah. (2011). Perdagangan Lintas Batas Di Kalimantan Barat ( Upaya Pencarian Model Dan Pola Perlindungan Hukum )*. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11(1), 1–10.

Hong, L., Tisdell, C., & Fei, W. (2019). Poverty and its reduction in a Chinese border region : is social capital important ? 7860. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2019.1591743

Kim, J. (2019). Ethnic capital, migration, and citizenship: a Bourdieusian perspective. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(3), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2019.1535131

Koentjaraningrat. (1998). Pengantar Antropologi II : Pokok-Pokok Etnografi. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Konrad, V., & Everitt, J. (2011). Borders and “belongers”: Transnational identities, border security, and cross-border socio-economic integration in the United States borderlands with Canada and the British Virgin Islands. Comparative American Studies, 9(4), 288–308. https://doi.org/10.1179/147757011X13045212814448

Malloy, T. H. (2016). Creating New Spaces for Politics ? The Role of National Minorities in Building Capacity of Cross- border Regions Creating New Spaces for Politics ? The Role of National Minorities in Building Capacity of Cross-border Regions. 7566(June). https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2010.484572

Mato, D. (1998). On the making of transnational identities in the age of globalization: The US latina/o-’latin’ American case. Cultural Studies, 12(4), 598–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.1998.10383123

Mavrommatis, G. (2015). South Asian tales: Ethnic entrepreneurship and narratives of spatialized transnational identities emerging in an East London (UK), inner-city area. Diaspora Studies, 8(2), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/09739572.2015.1029710

Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis : an expanded sourcebook / Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman. (Second Edi). London: Sage Publications, Inc.

Moret, J. (2016). Cross-border mobility, transnationality and ethnicity as resources: european Somalis’ post-migration mobility practices. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(9), 1455–1472. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1123089

N. K. Denzin. (2009). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Somerset, United States: Transaction Publishers.

Oki, K. K. (2018). PERBATASAN KABUPATEN TIMOR TENGAH UTARA DAN DISTRICT OEKUSI-TIMOR LESTE. (November), 287–294.

Okolie, M. J. N. (2019). The Politics and Poetics of Ethnic Bordering: Chukwuemeka Ike’s Sunset at Dawn. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 5655, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2019.1571936

Örkény, A., & Székelyi, M. (2016). Constructing border ethnic identities along the frontier of Central and Eastern Europe. Identities, 23(6), 667–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2015.1059342

Patji, A. R. (2010). Pengembangan Dan Perlindungan Kekayaan Budaya Daerah: Respon Pemerintah Indonesia Terhadap Adanya Klaim Oleh Pihak Lain. Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya Edisi Khusus, (167–188), 167–188. Retrieved from mb.lipi.go.id/index.php/jmb/article/viewFile/156/136

Paudyal, B. (2015). Reimagining Transnational Identities in Lahiri’s The Namesake . South Asian Review, 36(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02759527.2015.11933025

Pipkin, S., & Pipkin, S. (2018). Cashable Value : Social Capital and Practical Habits in the Analysis of Collaborative Cross-Border Economic Development Cashable Value : Social Capital and Practical Habits in the Analysis of Collaborative Cross-Border Economic Development. 5655. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2016.1197789

Prasetiyo, W. H., Kamarudin, K. R., & Dewantara, J. A. (2019). Surabaya green and clean: Protecting urban environment through civic engagement community. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 29(8), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1642821

Rensch, C. R., Rensch, C. M., Noeb, J., & Ridu, R. S. (2012). The Bidayuh Language: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow.

Schwarzenberg, T. (2019). Negotiating invisible lines: Cross-border emergency care in the rural north of Scandinavia. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 73(3), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2019.1645731

Soewarsono. (2005). Karakteristik Historis Daerah Perbatasan Kalimantan Barat. In Riwanto Tirtosudarmo dan John Haba (Ed.), Dari Entikong sampai Nunukan : Dinamika Daerah Perbatasan Kalimantan-Malaysia Timur (Sarawak dan Sabah) (1st ed., pp. 1–16). Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Suwartiningsih, S., Samiyono, D., & Purnomo, D. (2018). Harmonisasi Sosial Masyarakat Perbatasan Indonesia-Malaysia. In Jurnal Hubungan Internasional (Vol. 7). https://doi.org/10.18196/hi.71120

Tan, E. K. B. (2001). From sojourners to citizens: Managing the ethnic Chinese minority in Indonesia and Malaysia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(6), 949–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870120077922

Turner, J. H. (1987). Studying The human System. California: Good Year Publishing.

Wiratri, A., Sari, B. R., & Maunati, Y. (2017). Migrasi Transnasional dan Identitas Diaspora di Kota-Kota Perbatasan di Asia Tenggara: Studi Kasus Thailand dengan Myanmar dan Laos. Jurnal Kajian Wilayah, 8(1), 75–82.

Zemin, J. (2012). A few circumstances and opinions regarding the further stabilization of ethnic border regions. Chinese Law and Government, 45(3), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.2753/CLG0009-4609450303

Downloads

Published

2020-06-11

How to Cite

Efriani, E., Hasanah, H., & Bayuardi, G. (2020). Kinship of bidayuh dayak ethnic at the border of Entikong-Indonesia and Tebedu-Malaysia. ETNOSIA : Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia, 5(1), 136 - 149. https://doi.org/10.31947/etnosia.v5i1.8300

Issue

Section

Research Articles